<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Truth Behind Proposition 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertyslifeline.com/2008/11/29/the-truth-behind-proposition-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertyslifeline.com/2008/11/29/the-truth-behind-proposition-8/</link>
	<description>Fighting to Preserve Liberty in America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 15:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub"/>	<item>
		<title>By: Bill_OConnel</title>
		<link>http://libertyslifeline.com/2008/11/29/the-truth-behind-proposition-8/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill_OConnel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertyslifeline.com/?p=177#comment-53</guid>
		<description>I completely agree that Proposition 8 is stupid, only to be exceeded by the attempt to use the courts to re-define marriage. Can I get a court to re-define my children to be part of a minority group so that they have a better shot at college?  Can I get a court to re-define me as a former centerfielder for the New York Yankees, so I can sign autographs for adoring fans?  If it&#039;s rights they want, fine, go fight for your rights.  Just don&#039;t go redefining everyone else so that you can be more comfortable with who you are.  If you think it is cool to be tall, doesn&#039;t mean you can just get a court to say you are, and at the same time re-define all tall people as short. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree that Proposition 8 is stupid, only to be exceeded by the attempt to use the courts to re-define marriage. Can I get a court to re-define my children to be part of a minority group so that they have a better shot at college?  Can I get a court to re-define me as a former centerfielder for the New York Yankees, so I can sign autographs for adoring fans?  If it&#039;s rights they want, fine, go fight for your rights.  Just don&#039;t go redefining everyone else so that you can be more comfortable with who you are.  If you think it is cool to be tall, doesn&#039;t mean you can just get a court to say you are, and at the same time re-define all tall people as short. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reinkefj</title>
		<link>http://libertyslifeline.com/2008/11/29/the-truth-behind-proposition-8/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>reinkefj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertyslifeline.com/?p=177#comment-52</guid>
		<description>&gt;Marriage and the laws that eventually gave it protection and encouraged it  
&gt;were for the purpose of bringing children into the world. 
 
&quot;Marriage&quot; maybe have evolved as a societal protection. But not the laws. 
 
The &quot;laws&quot; about licensing &quot;marriage&quot; came about to prevent white women from marrying black men. These laws, as the &quot;saturday night special&quot; gun laws, were racist in original and intent.  
 
Further, the politicians, seeking to justify their income tax, put in tax preferences for &quot;married couples&quot;. That made it imperative for them to legislate and administrate the &quot;marriage contract&quot;.  
 
I&#039;d assert that the government (gooferment) has absolutely ZERO role in the whole subject of marriage. Given the illegitamacy rate. Given the cohabitation rate. Given the &quot;immorality&quot; of our current society. Given the smuttiness of leaders (i.e., marital infidelity). I&#039;d say that the gooferment should keep its nose out of moral issues. 
 
IMHO, Proposition 8 is an unwarranted intrusion into matters that are no concern of the government. 
 
 
 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Marriage and the laws that eventually gave it protection and encouraged it<br />
&gt;were for the purpose of bringing children into the world. </p>
<p>&quot;Marriage&quot; maybe have evolved as a societal protection. But not the laws. </p>
<p>The &quot;laws&quot; about licensing &quot;marriage&quot; came about to prevent white women from marrying black men. These laws, as the &quot;saturday night special&quot; gun laws, were racist in original and intent.  </p>
<p>Further, the politicians, seeking to justify their income tax, put in tax preferences for &quot;married couples&quot;. That made it imperative for them to legislate and administrate the &quot;marriage contract&quot;.  </p>
<p>I&#039;d assert that the government (gooferment) has absolutely ZERO role in the whole subject of marriage. Given the illegitamacy rate. Given the cohabitation rate. Given the &quot;immorality&quot; of our current society. Given the smuttiness of leaders (i.e., marital infidelity). I&#039;d say that the gooferment should keep its nose out of moral issues. </p>
<p>IMHO, Proposition 8 is an unwarranted intrusion into matters that are no concern of the government. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; What is Proposition 8 in California Really About? &#124; Liberty&#39;s Life &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://libertyslifeline.com/2008/11/29/the-truth-behind-proposition-8/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; What is Proposition 8 in California Really About? &#124; Liberty&#39;s Life &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertyslifeline.com/?p=177#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] In the 1947 movie, “Gentleman’s Agreement,” the character portrayed by Gregory Peck poses as a Jew to write about the discrimination against Jews in America . What was the solution? Did Jews find an activist judge who would redefine them .. More [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the 1947 movie, “Gentleman’s Agreement,” the character portrayed by Gregory Peck poses as a Jew to write about the discrimination against Jews in America . What was the solution? Did Jews find an activist judge who would redefine them .. More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

