May 2009

You Go First

by Bill O'Connell on May 13, 2009

Share and Recommend:

Dangerous Clowns

“The Obama administration has begun serious talks about how it can change compensation practices across the financial-services industry, including at companies that did not receive federal bailout money, according to people familiar with the matter.” — WSJ May 13, 2009

I’ve got a great idea!  Let’s have the President of the United States, who has absolutely no experience in running a business, set the compensation policy of all companies who take bailout money, federal funding of any kind, government contracts, or who are subject to federal regulation of any kind.

But President Obama is not without some experience in setting salaries.  In Congress, the members vote on their own compensation.  Isn’t that how it is where you work?  Let’s see.   The employees, Congress, tell their bosses, us, how much of a raise they are going to give themselves and there is nothing we can do about it without firing the employees, Congress.  In every company where I have worked or have run, the management determines the level of compensation.  The employee has the veto power of turning it down and taking their talent elsewhere, but the employee doesn’t say, “I’m giving myself and all my co-workers a 10% raise.  If you don’t like it go find new employees.”

Who Got Us Into This Mess?

Before touching a dime of compensation of any private company, start looking at all the people in government who contributed to this mess:  Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and yes, Senator Barack Obama.  They all need a haircut, no, a buzz cut. 

Once Congress puts on hair shirts, and a little self flagellation for good measure, and apologizes to the American people for what they did to us, then we can take them seriously about fixing the problems elsewhere.  But for now, they should clean up their own house.

Share and Recommend:

Obama’s Straw Men

by Bill O'Connell on May 13, 2009

Share and Recommend:

As Barack Obama famously said to Harry Reid, “I have a gift, Harry.”  Yes he does.  Barack Obama is quite a talented speaker.  One of his many talents is his use of props.  Huh?  One such prop is a rhetorical device that I will call the “Straw Man.”

The Straw Man

Obama uses the straw man to create a fictitious opponent.  This opponent is obviously a bad guy.  He’s insensitive, greedy, self serving, and even racist where he needs to be.  The problem is that he doesn’t exist.  But once created, Obama deftly maneuvers the straw man into whatever camp his opponents occupy and by doing so, vilify his real opponents by polluting them with the presence of the evil straw man.  Here’s an example.

When Obama was pushing for his stimulus package he said something like this, “I don’t agree with those who say we should do nothing,” and “I don’t agree with those who say only tax cuts will fix the economy,” and “Eight years of tax cuts and deregulation got us into this mess.”  Like unmasking a magician, let me share the trick, so you can see it next time.  Obama never says who the straw really is, because he doesn’t exist.  Who said we should do nothing with regard to the economy?  The Republicans who opposed him definitely had different views on what should be done, but I don’t know of anyone who said we should do nothing.  So Obama creates this fictitious straw man and you can almost hear the American people booing the straw man as he says it.  Okay, let’s check off the people don’t like the straw man.  By pointing out his opposition to the straw man and then by pointing out the Republicans are opposed to Obama’s plan, Obama hints that the straw man is really in the Republican camp.  Cue the crowd to start booing the Republicans. Pretty neat, eh?  He can’t make a frontal attack on the Republicans because he will have to fight them on the battlefield of ideas.  He creates an unpopular position that no one has and hangs it on his opponents.

Which regulation was lifted that resulted in the economic problems that we currently have?  Which tax cut resulted in the collapse in the housing market?  President Obama won’t name them because they don’t exist.  Were there government programs that caused this problem?  Sure, and I can name them.  Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Community Reinvestment Act, HUD, etc.  Were there people who fought against more regulation?  Yes, and they have names. Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Senator Barack Obama.  But these operators and programs are all part of the government and if there is one thing we have learned about President Obama it is that government is not big enough and Americans still have too much liberty left in their own hands.  His master plan is to reverse both of these.

Get the Torches Out

So now that you know what to look for, when you see President Obama float another straw man, put the torches to it.  If we had a responsible press, they would ask him to reveal who, specifically, he is talking about when he creates these straw men.  If he doesn’t have an answer queued up on the Teleprompter, it could be fun to watch.

Share and Recommend:

End the Blame Game, Take Responsiblity

by Bill O'Connell on May 1, 2009

Share and Recommend:

On President Obama’s 100th day in office, as part of his never ending election campaign he said, “Number one, we inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit…. That wasn’t me.”  The “blame it all on Bush” mantra is getting old, but this one is becoming particularly grating.  I would like to direct President Obama’s attention to the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 9:

“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law;”

Congress has the power of the purse, not the President.  That means that President Bush couldn’t spend a thin dime without the approval of Congress.  For the last two years of the Bush presidency, who controlled the United States Congress?  The Democrats.  And lest we forget, before he became President Obama, he was Senator Obama, a member in good standing of that same United States Congress.  Does anyone think for a minute that the Democratic Congress run by Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi was a rubber stamp for Bush?  Anything they disagreed with Bush on they would have fought tooth and nail.

Remember during the campaign when the Democrats were putting together their rescue package how the Republicans were locked out of the room and John McCain “suspended” his campaign to return to Washington to make something happen?  Remember as well that Obama was too busy campaigning to similarly get involved even though he was still a sitting Senator.

Now with the shoe on the other foot, and President Obama pushing to triple the deficit, the only people fighting him in Congress are the Republicans.  So this impending debt disaster is a joint effort by Obama and the Congressional Democrats.

President Obama can’t claim, like Bill Clinton, “don’t blame me, I came from Arkansas.”  President Obama can’t claim, like Jimmy Carter, “don’t blame me, I came from Georgia.”  President Obama came to the presidency from the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue.  He was an insider, not an outsider.  He owns just as much of this mess as Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid.

So, Mr. President, stop playing the blame game, take responsibility and do your job.


Share and Recommend:

The Specter Spectacle

by Bill O'Connell on May 1, 2009

Share and Recommend:

Politics Over Core Beliefs

Now that Arlen Specter has jumped ship to the Democratic Party, there is outrage amongst the Republicans.  Sorry, folks, but I don’t share your outrage so point that muzzle away from your other foot.  In 2004, Arlen Specter had a strong primary challenge from Pat Toomey, a conservative.  Toomey came within two percentage points of beating Specter and taking the Republican nomination.  Not sure that Toomey could win the general election and fearing losing control of the Senate to the Democrats, President Bush and Senator Rick Santorum, also a conservative, threw their weight behind Specter, a moderate at best, though a liberal label would fit all the same.

So, where do we stand today?  Bush is gone. Santorum is gone. The Democrats not only control the Senate but are a whisker away, with Specter’s help, of gaining filibuster-proof control.  It’s the same old story.  Republicans get weak kneed about being strong conservatives and then wonder why they lose?  They cut deals with liberals or statists as Mark Levin aptly calls them, and then get their heads handed to them on Election Day. Bush and Santorum should have either stayed out of the race or thrown their support behind Toomey back in ’04.  Specter won the primary and the general election and proceeded to thank Bush by sticking his thumb in Bush’s eye whenever he got the chance.

So spare me the angst, the hand ringing, the “how could yous?”.  Republicans had the chance to fix this in 2004 but they went wobbly, as Margaret Thatcher used to say.  So stop your whining and learn your lessons and don’t do it again.

Share and Recommend:
© 2009 Liberty's Lifeline. All Rights Reserved.