Foreign Policy: Good Will = Nothing. Surprise!

by Bill O'Connell on September 20, 2009

Share and Recommend:

Peter Baker writes in the New York Times, “Good Will, But Few Foreign Policy Benefits for Obama,” that

“As much as they may prefer to deal with Mr. Obama instead of his predecessor, George W. Bush, foreign leaders have not gone out of their way to give him what he has sought.”

Well, duh, who didn’t see that coming?  Who doesn’t prefer to negotiate with someone who wants to be your best friend, so that they can clean your clock before you realize what hit you?  I take that back, liberals didn’t see it coming and they never do.  One liberal that I can think of who could see it, is no longer with us, Daniel Patrick Moynihan.  He wrote a book about it referring to the world in it’s title A Dangerous Place.

So what has Obama’s policy of “engagement” gotten us?

  • Putin getting Obama to drop missile defenses based in Poland and the Czech Republic for… “a player to be named later” from Putin?
  • Ahmadinejad fixes an election in Iran, kills and rapes the opposition, presses on with its intention of getting nuclear weapons and the Obama administration says, “That’s a no, no,” as if chiding a tot.  Ahmadinejad can’t believe his good fortune.  He will play Russia off the U.S. and merrily stall until he has nuclear weapons and the missile technology to deliver them anywhere.
  • Chavez is trying to help a dictator abolish democracy in Honduras, and Obama and Clinton try to help him by telling the Honduran people that have to allow their law breaking former president to return to power.
  • Chavez is getting buddy-buddy with Ahmadinejad, so as soon as Iran has nuclear weapons, we may soon see nukes in South America.  JFK went to the brink of nuclear war to keep such weapons out of this Hemisphere.  Does anyone believe Obama would do the same?
  • North Korea continues to thumb its nose at the Obama Administration, while it tests more missiles until it gets one that can hit Kansas City.
  • Europeans dismiss Obama’s calls for more troops in Afghanistan
  • The Saudi’s dismiss (despite or because of,  the bowing of Obama to their king) his requests for concessions on Israel
  • Israel refuses to stop building settlements on the West Bank
  • Obama has marginalized the State Department.  What is Hillary Clinton actually responsible for?  Biden seems to be handling (?) Russia; George Mitchell the Middle East; Holbrooke Afghanistan; Dennis Ross for Iran.

Foreign policy could not be more fundamental to the office of the President (Constitution: Article II, Section 2), but today President Obama will appear on five Sunday talk shows to continue to push his health care initiative that 56% of the American people don’t want and the Constitution doesn’t identify as a federal function.  If he doesn’t get back on track with foreign policy it won’t be health care we need but medical triage in the aftermath of another terror attack or war on our soil.

Share and Recommend:
  • Pingback: Posts about Barack Obama as of September 20, 2009 » The Daily Parr

  • http://www.sibelmj.blogspot.com sibel

    Well! interesting conclusion, at least with all that dooms day article you have kept your sens of humor.
    It is possible that the world's government are playing Mr. Obama and not think him to be a strong leader. Its platform was on extending the hand of friendship to the world. But playing the cowboy did not get us anywhere in the world's view either. North Korea, Iran, and Israel did what they wanted to do regardless of the traits and ultimatum. I will hold my opinion on Mr. Obama. But thank you very much for your great information, it does help to see global facts. I do enjoy reading your blogs.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/Bill_OConnel Bill_OConnel

      While I see your point on cowboy vs. nice guy, I think back to Ronald Reagan (another cowboy) who put Pershing missiles in Europe when the world protested, and eventually brought the cold war to an end through strength. When Khadaffi in Libya saw Bush square off against Saddam Hussein, he shut down his nuclear program. On the other hand, nice guy Jimmy Carter, was played the fool by Iran for 444 days, however, when they saw that cowboy Reagan was coming in, they released the American hostages they held. Neither way works in all cases, but when you are perceived as the world leader, others will expect you to lead or they will perceive you as weak, and try to assert themselves. It is very simialar to the animal kingdom where there are herd animals (dogs, horses, etc.) the look for and want a leader, if they don't perceive one they then try to take over that role. Try training a dog if you waiver or waffle, (s)he will become incorrigible because they perceive themselves as the leader and you as the lower member of the pack.

  • http://camsioe.freewhost.com/sitemap.html Globals

    all good things

Previous post:

Next post:

© 2009 Liberty's Lifeline. All Rights Reserved.