When is Spending Saving? Whenever Obama Presents a Budget.

by Bill O'Connell on February 13, 2012

Share and Recommend:

 

President Barack Obama has a new budget. So it’s time to suspend reality and listen and nod your head and pine for four more years.

President Obama promised in 2009 to halve the deficit by the end of his first term. The last fiscal year budget deficit under Bush was $482 billion. In the four years of Obama’s first term it has yet to be less than $1 trillion. As former New York City Mayor Ed Koch used to asks his constituents, “How’m I doing?”

So while Obama’s new budget promises another trillion plus deficit, but don’t worry he will cut $4 trillion in spending over the next ten years. Never mind that even if he is reelected 60% of that timeline is beyond his control. It should also be pointed out that $4 trillion over ten years is only $400 billion a year, which leaves another $600 billion to be added to the national debt each year.

If that is not smoke and mirrors enough, that $4 trillion includes $1.5 trillion in tax increases. Why does this president and his backers insist that we have to take more money from the production of America’s citizens to cover his spending, rather than cutting his spending to fit within the available revenues?

For his first two years in office he worked with a Democrat controlled Congress. He got everything he asked for and everything is worse. We have staggering debt despite his promises to cut the deficit in half, unemployment worse than when he took office despite his promises to that his stimulus would cap unemployment at 8%, we have ObamaCare striking right at the heart of the First Amendment and he basically says, “get over it.”

Enough is enough. The experiment failed. It is time to cut this man loose and start working to repair the enormous damage he has done.

 

That’s my opinion; I’d like to know yours. Please comment below.

Share and Recommend:
  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_F2AASGJWPNMDYJWSKBSPYL4VM4 Cortney M

    It is BECAUSE they know how dismally the Bush economy failed that they seek to continue it. They still believe that by blocking anything that will help our economy continue to improve there are people so uneducated and ignorant that they will blame the President for the damage they do.
    The only damage Obama is doing is damage Control!
    Two days after the President took office he signed an executive order to close down Guantanamo. In the three years since then the Republicans have blocked the necessary funding to accomplish it at least seven times. Thanks to Tea Party blackmail the Bush tax giveaways to millionaires, which are the single largest contributing factor to the Bush Great Recession, were extended for another two years. Otherwise, the average American’s income taxes are LOWER now than they have been in 50 years. Yeah, defending the security and safety of the United States of America is a truly horrible thing to do. Maybe the President should waste another two trillion dollars and another 5,000 brave American soldiers by attacking a country that poses no threat to us. The President has already begun to get us past the idiotic No Child Left Behind program, granting waivers to a dozen states so they can return to actually educating children instead of playing politics and trying to teach creationism as science. Most of the “bailouts” came through TARP, one of George Bush’s going away presents to the American economic crisis. On the other hand, by setting up a loan program rather than a bailout for the American auto industry, we now have restored that industry to vitality and profitability and the loans are being paid back with interest.

    • http://libertyslifeline.com William O’Connell

      Cortney M, you are so breathlessly uninformed, I scarcely know where to start, but I will try.

      FACT: The last budget this president submitted to Congress it was voted down 97-0. Even the 1962 NY Mets won a few games. Not one Democrat Senator voted for it because they didn’t want to be on record as associated with it in any form.
      FACT: In violation of the Budget Control Act of 1974, the Democrat controlled senate has not passed a budget in nearly three years.
      FACT: In his first two years in office, Obama got whatever he wanted. He had a Democrat House, and a filibuster-proof Democrat Senate. The Republicans were powerless other than asked the outraged American people to complain to Congress. Guantanamo wasn’t closed because the most unqualified president in U.S. history discovered that it’s easy to throw promises around as a candidate and quite another thing to act when the results and responsibility are his. Reality bites.
      FACT: The famous Obama “cuts” in the payroll tax are chump change. A family could barely buy a pizza a week with the “savings”. Everyone who pays the payroll tax fully expects to get every dime back, and then some, when they retire through their Social Security checks. So this is robbing the Social Security Trust Fund which will be bankrupt even sooner because of this policy. But hey, by then, Obama will be making millions writing books and giving speeches. With regard to the Bush tax cuts, they are not give aways. The government doesn’t give money to anyone when taxes are cut, they take less. If you were robbed on the street and the robber left you with $10 instead of stealing it all would you go tell your friends and the police that the robber gave you $10? This is the idiotic thinking that Democrats and the main stream media feed to the American people.
      FACT: You seem to think Obama had nothing to do with TARP. Bush cooperated with Obama and asked Obama if he wanted funds released before Obama could take the oath of office so that the president-elect wouldn’t have to wait for the remaining $350 billion in TARP funds (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aXTl_q8nIqk8). Bush volunteered and was willing to act on Obama’s behalf for the good of the country. Obama accepted Bush’s offer and Obama has been slamming Bush ever since. Meanwhile Bush has followed the lead of most dignified ex-presidents (Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton are noted exceptions) and has not commented on the sitting president.
      FACT: Ford wasn’t bailed out by Obama and is doing well, thank you very much. The American public holds a large block of GM and stock and they won’t break even on that investment until the price of GM stock hits $52 per share. It is currently trading around $25 a share. That may be your definition of success but I don’t think your buddy Warren Buffett would agree. As for Chrysler, that company is owned by the Italian auto company, Fiat. Wow, what a whopping success!

      I have to agree with you about people being so uneducated. That is mainly because of the main stream media carrying water for the Democrats. You are proof enough of that. My job is to try to educate them. Some will learn and understand how much damage this president has done to this country. For some, like you, I am less optimistic.
      e your reply…

      • ~ Nona

        Sad to say, I have to share your pessimism….

  • Kevin

    The President’s numbers do not even begin to approach reality because
    they are based on interest rates which are not going to remain static. The only reason the Fed can keep interest rates this low is because the rest of the world is such a mess that our debt is still a relatively good investment, if you can believe that.  As soon as the demand for our debt tapers interest rates must rise.  When that happens our total debt will balloon to unfathomable proportions. And these sycophants answer by blaming Bush. Bush’s presidency will not end until Barack Obama’s presidency ends. And if he gets voted out of office, guess whose fault it will be?

  • Do Gap

    Honestly, you can’t fix America’s debt in as little as 4 years. It was still a lot when he first was elected into office. It will take a long time to get rid of inflation. It’s not just Obama’s fualt that he can’t get rid of debt! How long has it been increasing? How big was it before he started? Why don’t you go be president and fix America’s debt, huh?

    • Kevin

      “why don’t you go be president”?  Really? Neither I nor Mr. O’Connell need to run for president to solve this debt problem. It’s already been done at least once in my lifetime. But this president hasn’t the slightest clue what makes an economy tick or how to solve our debt problems. If he did, he would not have obstructed so many of the growth strategies that have worked for a generation. We already learned these lessons the last time around, but this president is blocked by his ideology from using them. In fact, they worked within four years.

      At this stage of the recovery of the last deep recession this country had, unemployment went down from 10.8% to 7.5%, GDP rose to a blistering 7.1%, compared with an anemic 2.8% in this recent version of a recovery. The time was 1984 and the President was Ronald Reagan, the one about whom the left loves to lie.  That recovery sparked the explosive economic growth that led to the prosperity people have taken so nonchalantly for the last generation. Before his presidency was over revenue to the US Treasury doubled. The subsequent growth that occurred was so substantial as to dwarf the deficit spending the Democrat controlled congress demanded in exchange for support for his economic program. As much squawking as the left did then about deficit spending, the debt and deficits of that era are laughable compared to the growth. That is the main lesson to be learned here, and the president, although claiming to be intelligent will not acknowledge historical fact.

Previous post:

Next post:

© 2012 Liberty's Lifeline. All Rights Reserved.