Maybe it was because he was trained as a medical doctor that Rand Paul knows that if you are going to lift something heavy you have to bend your knees and keep your back straight. Contrast that to the other members of Congress who stand on tiptoes, with their legs straight, bent at the waist leaning far over and picking through the $1.6 trillion deficit using only their thumb and forefinger, to find some morsel that they can extract from the budget, crying all the while “It’s too heavy, it’s too heavy.”
Energy
Did you hear the news on broadcast television what Al Gore said about Ethanol? Neither did I. You have to dig a little further to find news that goes against the progressive grain.
In his resignation letter, Hal Lewis, writes nostalgically about his sixty-seven year association with the American Physical Society. He paints the picture of the early years as being a pure love of science and no real chance to become wealthy in the career choice of a physicist. All of that has changed and there is no more glaring example of that than the expert with no scientific training, Al Gore, leading the parade. Here is part of his letter.
As they say, when it rains it pours. The Obama administration famously boasted about having its boot on the neck of BP and extorting $20 billion from the company without the benefit of due process, but now a different assessment emerges.
According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, faulted the administration on several fronts. “A White House spokesman didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.”
It is quite clear that this administration stumbled and bumbled along at the start of the disaster, once again fully displaying its inexperience in executive matters. Here are some of the salient points from the commission.
- “A sense of over optimism” about the disaster “may have affected the scale and speed with which national resources were brought to bear.”
- In addition, the government’s underestimate of how much oil was flowing into the Gulf of Mexico gave the impression that the government “was either not fully competent to handle the spill or not fully candid.”
- The administration took “an overly casual approach” in calculating that between 1,000 and 5,000 barrels per day were flowing when the real number was around 35,000 to 60,000 barrels per day
- Their initial low estimate remained the official estimate for a full month
- The administration was initially slow to respond and then misdirected resources when the public grew increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress.
I received an e-mail from my Congressman telling me how he was on top of the situation in the Gulf:
“I am a member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, which is at the forefront of an aggressive (sic) Congressional response to BP’s oil spill. Last week, I voted in Committee to approve a comprehensive legislative response to environmental and economic liability issues raised by the spill.”
As I had written about previously (The Regulators are Dead, Long Live the Regulators), this was just one more case of government failing us but then rushing out more legislation and control so it won’t happen again. If government was doing its job, it shouldn’t have happened in the first place. So I wrote back to the Congressman.
Dear Congressman Bishop,
I read with interest your e-mail to me about the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, which you say is at the forefront of an aggressive Congressional response to BP’s oil spill. Excuse my skepticism but this sounds like one more “we’re really gonna fix it this time,” response to the failure of government to do what they are already empowered to do.
You say the Oil Spill Accountability and Environmental Protection Act of 2010 “will ensure that responsible parties will be responsible for 100% of the oil pollution cleanup costs.” If I am not mistaken it was the Congress that passed a law limiting the damages from an oil spill to $75 million, which created a moral hazard that perhaps encouraged BP to cut corners. But wasn’t it BP who voluntarily waived the $75 million limit and has promised from the start that they would pay the full costs, thereby helping Congress remove the egg from their collective faces for including the limit in the first place? Don’t get me wrong, BP has a lot to answer for but at the same time BP applied to the government regulators for several waivers of safety tests and requirements that the government granted. If government had been doing their job, perhaps this would never have happened in the first place.
Aside from closing the barn door after the horse has escaped, I see no mention in your e-mail about holding Congressional hearings to ask the Obama Administration why they have not yet suspended the Jones Act and accepted the offer of help from twelve countries in the cleanup effort. When asked, Thad Allen and Carol Browner offered the weak excuse that no one asked them for a waiver. Why did the administration stand in the way of Louisiana building sand berms to stop the oil from reaching the coast because of environmental reasons? From an environmental disaster standpoint, doesn’t the oil gushing in the Gulf trump other concerns? We seem to have multiple agencies operating in the Gulf and each one is getting in the way of each other and no one in the administration is taking the lead to clear the red tape. Why is that Congressman?
Instead of talking about preventing avoidable disasters in the future, why don’t you find out why this avoidable disaster was not prevented by the regulations we have on the books and by the agencies in charge of doing so? For once, perhaps you can wait until those facts are known before you rush out to craft more legislation to fix a problem like you did with the financial services industries when it will be months before the Angelides Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission has finished its investigation.
Government that works is more important than signing ceremonies for ill considered legislation that is rushed and voted upon but unread by our representatives.
Sincerely yours,
William R. O’Connell
I am sure there will be a signing ceremony and tough talk about how we’re really putting an end to this wild unfettered market, but if you trace it back this disaster had government leading the way. It forced the oil companies to drill in deeper water; it created a moral hazard by capping their liability for any spills to $75 million (which BP waived and accepted responsibility for the full costs); the regulatory agency in charge both collects royalty payments from the oil companies and assesses penalties for failure to comply with regulations; and that same agency granted BP several waivers to take shortcuts before the well failed. But don’t worry Congress is really going to get tough now.








