The old adage goes, if a tree falls in the forest and there is no one there to hear it, does it make any noise? I guess today you could say, if a death threat is made toward Barack Obama at a McCain rally and the Secret Service agents who were present neither heard it nor can find anyone who did, did the threat really happen? If you are holding a deck full of race cards, apparently so.
Race has overshadowed this campaign from the moment Barack Obama won his first caucuses. The interesting twist is that those assumed to be the real racists in America, conservatives and by extension all Republicans, have scrupulously avoided any discussion of race whatsoever. The ones who can’t stop talking about race are those on the left.
By continually bringing the subject up and the keeping the whiff of racism in the air, they hope to force those who fear being called racist to vote for Obama just to prove they are not racists! Has John McCain given any speeches that brought up Obama’s race? However, after the Reverend Jeremiah Wright blew up in his face, Barack Obama went on to give a major speech in Philadelphia on race in America (A More Perfect Union).
What prompted the speech was the anti-white, anti-American sentiment expressed by Obama’s minister. In that speech Obama said that despite the positive and historic start to his campaign, race crept in. “We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary.” Wasn’t that Bill Clinton, a liberal Democrat, who was accused of that? He went on to describe his candidacy as seen by some as, “the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap.” it’s pretty self-explanatary who’s talking about race here. In another speech Obama talked about how he looked different than the Presidents whose faces were on our currency.
Congressman John Lewis, a hero of the Civil Rights movement, compared McCain and Palin to George Wallace. Based on what? Personal attacks, of course. What were the nature of these personal attacks? Well the Republicans said that Barack Obama was lying about his relationship with Wiliam Ayers. I fail to see that as a personal attack. Obama has hardly been forthcoming about his relationship with Ayers and only reveals another piece of the puzzle when he is forced to do so. At first Ayers was just a guy in the neighborhod, but as more and more facts were revealed about the extent of their relationship, Obama would release another “clarification” such as, yes they served on the same board, but seldom met. How is calling Obama on this considered a personal attack and where is the racism? If you want to know what a personal attack feels like, ask Sarah Palin.
Now Sarah Palin is being attacked as a racist because she uses the terms “Joe six-pack” and “Hockey Mom.” Apparently because blacks don’t play much hockey or drink six packs of beer, it is really a code word for “whites only” rather than meaning average Americans. I guess to be politically correct she should should say, “Hockey Moms, Basketball Moms, Football Moms, Cricket Moms, Soccer Moms, Badminton Moms…” and I don’t even want to get into the favored adult beverage of minorities for fear of that being a racist stereotype in and of itself. I’d rather listen to a speech that has a good cadence and is well written and delivered than something leaden that touches all the politically correct bases.
The latest race card drawn from the bottom of the deck is the death threats at McCain and Palin rallies. The U.S. Secret Service was unable to corroborate anyone shouting out “kill him”. But that hasn’t stopped the Obama camp from playing it for all it is worth. Why would they do that? One reason would be to get some independents to move his way out of sympathy and guilt. Another would be to keep those who are in his camp who are getting cold feet to stay in his camp rather than going over to the racists. I thought the term was Commander in Chief, not Manipulator in Chief. How do you feel?
