deficit

When is Spending Saving? Whenever Obama Presents a Budget.

by Bill O'Connell on February 13, 2012

Share and Recommend:

 

President Barack Obama has a new budget. So it’s time to suspend reality and listen and nod your head and pine for four more years.

Click to read more

Share and Recommend:

Statically Stuck on Stupid

by Bill O'Connell on November 10, 2011

Share and Recommend:

photo by cliff1066

Just because Democrats are statically stuck on stupid, why do they think everyone else is? What I am referring to is static analysis of changes to the tax code. Democrats always want to have any potential changes statically scored. In other words if Democrats raise rates 10%, naturally, the government will get 10% more revenue. If on the other hand you cut tax rates 10%, a very bad thing, tax revenues will fall 10%. The problem is that they have been proved wrong every time. In other words, Democrats believe that if they raise tax rates you will be too stupid to change your behavior in response.

Click to read more

Share and Recommend:
Share and Recommend:

For all the grandiose talk of cutting $4 trillion which will remain undefined, or $2 trillion which is not bold enough, President Obama proves once again when faced with a real solution, he will do anything to kill it.

Click to read more

Share and Recommend:

Well Past Time to Get Serious about Spending

by Bill O'Connell on March 17, 2011

Share and Recommend:



You have to smack your head listening to Schumer, Weiner, Pelosi, Reid wailing like crybabies that the spending cuts proposed by the Republicans are too harsh. Perhaps it’s time to shut the government down and like a parent at wits end, send the babies home for a timeout.

  Click to read more

Share and Recommend:

President Obama’s Budget Lands with a Thud

by Bill O'Connell on February 15, 2011

Share and Recommend:

President Barack Obama released his budget blueprint on the same day the White House says it expects the budget deficit for the current fiscal year ending in October to hit $1.65 trillion. His budget calls for spending cuts of $1 trillion spread out over ten years.  Click to read more

Share and Recommend:

CBO – Deficit Will Be $3 Trillion Higher

by Bill O'Connell on March 20, 2009

Share and Recommend:

Obama called for bipartisanship during the campaign. Well here it is. The bipartisan Congressional Budget Office says President Obama’s budget plan is a disaster. But the bumbling, stumbling Obama administration puts their inexperience on full display. Press Secretary Gibbs dismissed the report comparing it to picking Final Four brackets six years out.

Perhaps, the President should forget Jay Leno and start reading Ronald Reagan’s writings.

Share and Recommend:

Bipartisanship Begins At Home

by Bill O'Connell on February 24, 2009

Share and Recommend:

New York, like many states, is in the midst of a state budget crisis.  The state is facing a $14 billion budget deficit.  The cause of the problem is pretty clear, too much spending.  State spending has grown far in excess of inflation and population growth.  What provided the wallop is the sharp downturn on Wall Street, which drastically cut revenues to the state.  But the state does not have any reserves to speak of.

We’re All in This Together, Right?

Everyone is being asked to tighten their belts.  The Democrats had previously held the State Assembly and now control both houses of the legislature and the governorship.  Among the strongest supporters of the Democrats in this very blue state are the labor unions.  They wholeheartedly support the spending increases that the Democrats propose every year especially where those increases shower wages and benefits on their members.

So while the Democrats, with no place to hide, are scrambling to close the budget gap why do I see commercial after commercial on television urging me to tell the governor and the legislature to make the necessary cuts elsewhere and not to touch their sacred cow.  The commercials are from the police unions, the teacher unions, the health care worker unions, the university professor unions, the public employee unions, all urging us to rise up and make sure the cuts are not directed at them.

Chutzpah

After years and years of spending increases under both Republicans and Democrats, and year after year of fat labor contracts for these unions because the politicians were too cowardly to confront them or turn down their money and electoral support, we are now in this mess.  But now instead of shouldering their share of the burden, some of which was a result of their greed, they are telling their fellow New Yorkers to take on more of the pain and spare them.  How about a little bipartisanship on behalf of the unions and suck it up and help your fellow New Yorkers carry the load you created.

Where’s Ronald Reagan when you need him?

Share and Recommend:

Emergency or Not?

by Bill O'Connell on February 17, 2009

Share and Recommend:

“Because each day we wait to begin the work of turning our economy around, more people lose their jobs, their savings and their homes. And if nothing is done, this recession might linger for years. Our economy will lose 5 million more jobs. Unemployment will approach double digits. Our nation will sink deeper into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse” — Barack Obama, Op-ed piece in Washington Post, Feb. 5, 2009

Each day we wait…The most massive increase in government spending in the history of the Republic was passed on Friday night by the Senate, making it ready for President Obama’s signature.  Even Senator Sherrod Brown, had a private plane take him from his mother’s wake to cast the deciding vote on Friday night.

No Time to Read the Bill

Despite the enormity of this deficit spending increase that will saddle our children and our children’s children with a huge debt burden, and despite promises from President Obama concerning transparency and time to adequately review legislation, no one had the time to read this bill before it was passed.  You don’t believe me?  Do the math.  In 48 hours there are 2,880 minutes.  The stimulus bill is over 1,100 pages long.  So if you did nothing else for the 48 hours, you didn’t sleep, you didn’t eat, you didn’t go to the lavatory, you would have about 2 1/2 minutes to read and comprehend each page in the bill.

As President Obama said in the Post, we have no choice, this is URGENT!  So naturally, President Obama was standing with pen ready as soon as the Senate passed the bill.  It was raced up Pennsylvania Avenue to the White House to the waiting Chief Executive, or not.

  • Friday night – President Obama does not sign the bill
  • Saturday – President Obama does not sign the bill
  • Sunday – President Obama does not sign the bill
  • Monday – President Obama does not sign the bill

Pretty urgent, huh?  “Each day we wait to begin the work of turning our economy around, more people lose their jobs.”  So I guess the crisis has passed?  I guess losing more jobs no longer matters?

Do you think it might have been prudent to give the members of Congress and the American people the extra four days to review the bill before signing it? Of course it would be prudent, but the more we examine this the more it becomes clear that this is not about stimulus.  It is about rushing through a bevy of liberal spending programs under the guise of an emergency precisely so that it would not receive the scrutiny it deserves, because if it did, most Americans would be outraged.

The reason for delaying the signing for four days, is to get the most political mileage out of the signing.  Signing it on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, the Monday holiday, would simply not have the news coverage for President Obama to bask in.

American’s Interest or Self Interest

So despite all the rhetoric, the American people get a massive debt burden, the Democrats in Congress get all the spending goodies that have been stored in the closet waiting for the right crisis opportunity, and President Obama gets just the right amount of limelight.  Is that the change you were hoping for?

Share and Recommend:

Keep the Change

by Bill O'Connell on January 6, 2009

Share and Recommend:

Early this morning I was listening to a news broadcast where they said that this fiscal year’s federal budget deficit (October 2008-September 2009) will top $1 trillion which is more that triple the largest budget deficit in history.  That sounded pretty bad even considering the financial bailout that the government was undertaking to keep the money flowing.

Reading later in the day in the Wall Street Journal, Obama is quoted as saying, “We’re already looking at a $1 trillion budget deficit or close to a $1 trillion budget deficit, and potentially we’ve got $1 trillion deficits for years to come,” {emphasis added}.  Years to Come?  This is hope? This is change? I’ll give you a moment to try to wrap your mind around that statement before I continue.

If we see trillion dollar deficits for years to come, That’s All Folks!, our economy is gone, G-O-N-E.

Now I understand he may have just been saying that for the shock effect because he follows that statement with the another about the necessity of budget reform.  Budget reform? People, budget reform is not going to close a trillion dollar shortfall, and the very fact that the president-elect even utters the words is like shouting FIRE in a crowded theater.  Does he think that is leadership?  Here is where Obama’s lack of executive experience is on full display, and the man is yet to take office.

In an excellent piece on Cafe Hayek, Russ Roberts explains that if you cut taxes but you do not cut spending by an equal or larger amount, you are not really cutting taxes.  All you are doing is moving them around.  To put it another way, if you cut taxes today and spend the same or more, you are just deferring the taxes to later.  The debt will eventually have to be paid and it is paid through taxes.  So with trillion dollar budget deficits on the horizon, there will be a tax bill coming due that will crush the economy for us or for our children.

Someone needs to take Obama aside and tell him never to make such a public statement again, lest someone throw a net over him and carry him off to an asylum.  Second, he needs to get with his advisors and start hacking away at the size of the government and I recommend starting with the Department of Education.  Although it took 28 years for that department to spend a trillion dollars, it’s a start.  But this is not going to be fixed by tinkering or eliminating earmarks.  Our government has gotten too big and is meddling in too many things, causing many of the problems it is now trying to fix.  Government needs to be cut down to size.

Share and Recommend:
© 2012 Liberty's Lifeline. All Rights Reserved.