Election

How the Pros Steal an Election

by Bill O'Connell on January 6, 2009

Share and Recommend:

Who could forget, if the left would ever let us, the Florida brouhaha about Bush stealing the election?  The fact is that Bush won the election, he won the recount, he won the re-recount, and he not only won according to a investigation by the Miami Herald and USA Today but according to that investigation if the rules that the Gore team wanted were applied, Bush’s margin of victory would have tripled.  But all you ever hear from the left is that Bush “stole” the election.  When it comes to stealing elections the Democrats are the pros.

In 2004, the race for the governorship of Washington state was very close with Republican Dino Rossi winning over Democrat Christine Gregoire by a mere 261 votes.  Under Washington law a vote that close requires a machine re-count.  The results of the hand recount was that Rossi won again, this time by 42 votes.  Rather than concede, the Democrats ponied up $800,000 for a hand re-count.  After that recount it showed Gregoire ahead by 129 votes.  Okay, shut it down, it’s over, we have a winner.  Due to the closeness of the race Rossi asked Gregoire to a runoff election.  Gregoire refused.  As she put it, “The bottom line is the election is over. Today we have a governor-elect. It’s time to move forward, and I am prepared to take on the people’s work.”  In King’s county, the final tally had 3,539 more votes counted than voters who participated in the election.

Fast forward to Minnesota.  When the election results came in Norm Coleman, the Republican won by just over 700 votes.  After the election, ballots started showing up in the trunk of cars; some districts were ruled that the election night votes were accurate, other districts were ruled the opposite;  a number of duplicate ballots were not marked duplicate as required and so were counted twice.  Many districts had the same situation as the Washington election where the numbers of votes tallied exceeded the number of voters.

So where is the outrage from the media.  Bush wins four out of four and he “stole” the election.  Gregoire and Franken lose the general election and some shady counting turns up in the recount or recounts (you have to keep recounting until the Democrat is ahead and then you immediately stop), where you have more votes than voters and everything it just fine.  Just like we have heard next to nothing about the Washington election these past four years, don’t expect to hear much from the press when Democrats steal an election.

Share and Recommend:

President Elect Obama — Day One

by Bill O'Connell on November 5, 2008

Share and Recommend:

From now until Inauguration Day we will get a sense for which Barack Obama will emerge as the 44th President of the United States.  Here are some thoughts:

“President Obama will face daunting challenges from the day he takes office. We look forward, however, to being part of the enormous wave of civic and political engagement that his Presidency has inspired and that will enable him to achieve the things that have been on the top of his agenda and ours. We look forward to the change all of us worked so hard to create.”

{italics and emphasis added}

Stay tuned….

Share and Recommend:

Sarkozy says Obama “Utterly Immature” on Iran

by Bill O'Connell on October 29, 2008

Share and Recommend:

We have been led to believe that America needs Barack Obama to “repair” our reputation in Europe and the rest of the world.  In France, of all places, it doesn’t look like he’s off to a great start.  Although French President Nicolas Sarkozy, has tried to talk about it only in private, he has characterized Obama’s stance on Iran, “Utterly Immature.”  Joe Biden, call your office, I think you can add another crisis to your radar screen.

Share and Recommend:

When is a Death Threat Not a Death Threat?

by Bill O'Connell on October 19, 2008

Share and Recommend:

The old adage goes, if a tree falls in the forest and there is no one there to hear it, does it make any noise? I guess today you could say, if a death threat is made toward Barack Obama at a McCain rally and the Secret Service agents who were present neither heard it nor can find anyone who did, did the threat really happen?  If you are holding a deck full of race cards, apparently so.

Race has overshadowed this campaign from the moment Barack Obama won his first caucuses.  The interesting twist is that those assumed to be the real racists in America, conservatives and by extension all Republicans, have scrupulously avoided any discussion of race whatsoever.  The ones who can’t stop talking about race are those on the left.

By continually bringing the subject up and the keeping the whiff of racism in the air, they hope to force those who fear being called racist to vote for Obama just to prove they are not racists!  Has John McCain given any speeches that brought up Obama’s race?  However, after the Reverend Jeremiah Wright blew up in his face, Barack Obama went on to give a major speech in Philadelphia on race in America (A More Perfect Union).

What prompted the speech was the anti-white, anti-American sentiment expressed by Obama’s minister.  In that speech Obama said that despite the positive and historic start to his campaign, race crept in.  “We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary.”  Wasn’t that Bill Clinton, a liberal Democrat, who was accused of that?  He went on to describe his candidacy as seen by some as, “the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap.” it’s pretty self-explanatary who’s talking about race here.  In another speech Obama talked about how he looked different than the Presidents whose faces were on our currency.

Congressman John Lewis, a hero of the Civil Rights movement, compared McCain and Palin to George Wallace.  Based on what?  Personal attacks, of course.  What were the nature of these personal attacks?  Well the Republicans said that Barack Obama was lying about his relationship with Wiliam Ayers.  I fail to see that as a personal attack.  Obama has hardly been forthcoming about his relationship with Ayers and only reveals another piece of the puzzle when he is forced to do so.  At first Ayers was just a guy in the neighborhod, but as more and more facts were revealed about the extent of their relationship, Obama would release another “clarification” such as, yes they served on the same board, but seldom met.  How is calling Obama on this considered a personal attack and where is the racism?  If you want to know what a personal attack feels like, ask Sarah Palin.

Now Sarah Palin is being attacked as a racist because she uses the terms “Joe six-pack” and “Hockey Mom.”  Apparently because blacks don’t play much hockey or drink six packs of beer, it is really a code word for “whites only” rather than meaning average Americans.  I guess to be politically correct she should should say, “Hockey Moms, Basketball Moms, Football Moms, Cricket Moms, Soccer Moms, Badminton Moms…”  and I don’t even want to get into the favored adult beverage of minorities for fear of that being a racist stereotype in and of itself.  I’d rather listen to a speech that has a good cadence and is well written and delivered than something leaden that touches all the politically correct bases.

The latest race card drawn from the bottom of the deck is the death threats at McCain and Palin rallies.  The U.S. Secret Service was unable to corroborate anyone shouting out “kill him”.  But that hasn’t stopped the Obama camp from playing it for all it is worth.  Why would they do that?  One reason would be to get some independents to move his way out of sympathy and guilt.  Another would be to keep those who are in his camp who are getting cold feet to stay in his camp rather than going over to the racists.  I thought the term was Commander in Chief, not Manipulator in Chief.  How do you feel?

Share and Recommend:

Save Me, I’m Drowning!

by Bill O'Connell on October 14, 2008

Share and Recommend:

What brings someone off the sidelines and into the game?  I have always enjoyed history and politics.  I savor a meaty conversation with both conservatives and liberals.  Up until now those conversations have been private.  I generally kept my views concealed from strangers.  As the 2008 Presidential election draws near I have become more concerned about the loss of our liberty.  Both candidates have, to one degree or another, taken liberties with our liberty.

Government has grown enormously and shows no sign of abating.  The larger our government becomes, the less liberty we enjoy.  The more complex it becomes, the less it is a government of the people, by the people, for the people and more a government of, by and for the bureaucrats.

One of the primary arguments against term limits is that it takes time to understand the complexity of government and if we employ term limits the politicians would be forced out of office just as they were starting to understand it.  Does that scare you?  It certainly scares me.  I see a permanent underclass of bureaucrats who really run the government, and our representatives and we are just dragged along for the ride.

Consider the financial emergency we currently face.  When Treasury secretary Hank Paulson came up with his $700 billion rescue plan it was said to consist of 3  pages.  When the House of Representatives crafted that into legislation it became 110 pages.  That was voted down and then the Senate produced their version.  That one weighed in at 450 pages.  Think about it.  Suppose you are a Senator.  You have to vote on this critical issue and time is perilously short.  Do you have time to sit down and read a 450 page document?  Not only read it but comprehend it and all of its implications?  Or do you rely on staffers and lobbyists telling you what it says and how you should vote?  From 3 pages to 110 pages to 450 pages in about a week and a half.  That is simply staggering.

As I watched this debacle unfold, I envisioned Lady Liberty sinking into New York Harbor, struggling to tread water.  The turning point for me was reading that Christopher Buckley, son of the conservative icon, William F. Buckley, Jr., was going to pull the lever for Barack Obama.  Before Lady Liberty slipped beneath the waves I felt compelled to heave a lifeline to the ol’ gal and dive in.

It is my strongly held belief that to a great extent we have forgotten what liberty means.  We have forgotten the principle upon which this nation was founded and the ideal for which hundreds of thousands of Americans shed their blood to protect and defend it.

It is my purpose and intent, in my own meager and humble way, to reignite that spark and, rekindle that flame so that Lady Liberty’s torch can continue burning brightly as a beacon for the world rather than a remain on the sidelines, sadly shaking my head as the torch flickers out.

Share and Recommend:
© 2009 Liberty's Lifeline. All Rights Reserved.