Holder

Obama Suspends the End of Racism

by Bill O'Connell on July 2, 2010

Share and Recommend:

His election was a major milestone in the history of the United States.  Leaving aside his political philosophy which a number of us opposed and more are seeing that philosophy more clearly now, electing the first African American to the presidency with 53% of the popular vote no less, truly shows how far our nation has come from the dark days of slavery.

Having achieved this milestone has proved a two edged sword to the progressives and statists.  By celebrating the election of Barack Obama it also signaled the defusing of the most potent weapon in their arsenal, the race card.  How can you routinely call America a racist country when we just elected an African American President of the United States?  By winning with 53% of the popular vote, more than Bill Clinton in two elections and more than Jimmy Carter, it was clear that the black vote alone could not have elected him.  It required him winning over many white voters as well.  How do you continue to justify Affirmative Action when an African American was chosen by his fellow citizens to the most powerful position on earth?  But the progressives and the statists continue to pull the trigger on this dud, particularly where the Tea Party movement is involved, without proof and without shame.

 A New Dark Chapter?

Ironically, it is the Obama administration that is practicing a new kind of racism that the mainstream media is conspiring with them to hide.

During the 2008 election, several members of the Black Panthers dressed in paramilitary uniforms and brandishing a nightstick, stood outside of a polling place in Philadelphia intimidating voters by their physical presence and through verbal taunts.  The Black Panthers were caught on video tape and as this was a clear violation of the Voting Rights act, charges were filed against them.  J. Christian Adams, one of the attorneys at the Department of Justice handling the case called it the “easiest case I’ve ever had.”  The facts were clear, the video tape provided irrefutable evidence and the defendants didn’t show up in court to dispute the charges.  Because they didn’t show up, the judge issued a default judgment, meaning the Justice Department won the case and only the punishment remained.  That is, until the new leadership of the Justice Department weighed in.

 This case was originally filed in the last days of the Bush administration.  So with the victory in hand, the Justice attorneys handling the case were told to dismiss the charges and drop the case.  The reason given was that the “facts and the law don’t support the case.”  It was further ordered that these kinds of cases were “not going to happen out of the Civil Rights Division” of the DOJ.  In other words, where the plaintiff was white and the defendant was black, the Civil Rights Division of the Department would not pursue the case.  If a regional United States Attorney brought a case, the DOJ would permit it to go forward, but not from within the Civil Rights division.

The individuals who delivered this order were Loretta King and Steve Rosenbaum, political appointees.  Adams went further to say that Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez of lying under oath to a federal commission about the circumstances surrounding the decision to drop the probe.   The Justice Department denied Adams allegation:

 “It is not uncommon for attorneys within the department to have good faith disagreements about the appropriate course of action in a particular case, although it is regrettable when a former department attorney distorts the facts and makes baseless allegations to promote his or her agenda,” she said in a written statement.

Mere partisan politics?  Sour grapes?  You might think that until you hear from Bartle Bull, a lifelong Democrat and Civil Rights attorney who was an eye witness to the incident.  Here is an interview with Mr. Bull and Megyn Kelly of Fox News.  It is nothing less than stunning.  Interview.   He describes how one of the Black Panthers said to him and a person with him, “Now you will see what it’s like to be ruled by the black man, cracker.”

The first African American president has people in his administration who will not enforce the Voting Rights Act if the person whose rights are being violated is white.  I need not point out that if  the Ku Klux Klan was standing in front of the polling place and the Justice Department dropped the case against them what the outrage would be.  But with the mainstream media merely the propaganda arm of the administration, this news is only being carried by Fox News and on the Internet.

President Obama and Attorney General Holder must answer to this outrage.  They have to tell the American people why they refuse to carry out their sworn duty and enforce the law, particularly when the case was already won and they demanded that the charges be dropped and that no new cases would originate from the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice.  A great moment in American history will have a stain upon it unless President Obama immediately reverses course.

Share and Recommend:

Obama’s Unraveling

by Bill O'Connell on January 6, 2009

Share and Recommend:

I was wondering how long it would take for Barack Obama’s lack of experience or a power base to manifest itself, but it appears the moment has arrived, and the problems keep coming.

His recent announcement or leak by his aides that Leon Panetta is his choice for head of the CIA is confounding, to say the least.  Panetta may be a nice man, and a good administrator, but in the midst of the War on Terror who but a rookie would put a rookie as head of the CIA?  Apparently Obama couldn’t push back those on the left who want no one who agrees with the Bush Administration in the post.  Two other potential appointees got hooted down by Obama’s supporters so he had to go with this pick.  The CIA is notorious for not liking outsiders.  Panetta has no intelligence experience, other than listening in on security briefings as Clinton’s Chief of Staff.

Bill Richardson withdraws his name from nomination as Commerce Secretary, due to a gathering scandal.

Eric Holder as Attorney General pick approved pardons for the FALN terrorists while working in the Clinton Justice Department and now he is responsible for prosecuting terrorists.

The Blagojevich scandal doesn’t want to go away and now the Democrats are battling over whether or not they will seat the man appointed to replace Obama in the Senate

We have the Coleman/Franken fiasco in Minnesota; Charlie Rangel under investigation for not paying taxes despite being chairman of the committee that writes the tax laws (Ways and Means); an item in the NY Times about a donation to the Clinton library from an individual who benefited from legislation supported by Hillary Clinton…

How long before the press decides the honeymoon is over?

Share and Recommend:

Obama Watch — Week 3

by Bill O'Connell on November 22, 2008

Share and Recommend:

It’s three weeks since the election.  Where do things stand now?

  1. Appointments – Now it gets interesting.  Some of the less exciting picks, although not without the potential for mischief are Tom Daschle at Health and Human Services, Janet Napolitano at Homeland Security, and Bill Richardson at Commerce.  The more interesting choices are:
    • Eric Holder – Attorney General.  It is reported that Barack Obama asked around about possible problems with this nomination and was satisfied that there would be little.  However, since the announcement the concerns are getting aired.  First, there is his participation in the Marc Rich pardon.  Holder claims that he “never devoted a great deal of time to this matter.”  However, an Op-Ed piece in the NY Times by George Lardner, Jr. paints a very different picture.  Mr. Lardner helped cover the story for the Washington Post at the time.  Second, Holder was involved in the Elian Gonzalez case where the child was taken at gunpoint in violation of a court order.  Holder claimed the child wasn’t taken at gunpoint, however there is a Pulitzer Prize Winning photograph showing just that.  That’s two for two on the mendacity score.  Obama might want to re-think this one before it turns toxic.
    • Hillary Clinton – Secretary of State.  This could be another sign of Obama’s political genius that is only matched by Bill Clinton himself.  He brings his arch rival into his administration thus blunting her ability to be a critic.  He broker’s a deal where Bill Clinton has to come clean on all his wheelings and dealings, disclose to Obama’s team all the donors, foreign and domestic, to the Clinton Library, and promise to keep the new administration advised of his comings and goings.  As Lyndon Johnson famously said of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, “I’d rather have him inside the tent pissing out, than outside the tent pissing in.”  This will also be the acid test of his ongoing political skill.  He will have two tigers by the tail.  If Hillary goes off message, or Bill slips his leash, Obama has to decide what to do.  He could fire Hillary, which might be enough of an embarrassment that the threat of doing so would keep her in line.  On the other hand, he would have to face all of those 18 million Hillary supporters in the Democratic Party, if he didn’t have a very good reason to do so, that they also felt was a very good reason.  Bill is even a tougher call.  The only counterweight there is that if he goes off and does something questionable with a foreign government, it could be a greater embarrassment to the Secretary of State, his wife.  Where’s Joe Biden?  Biden was picked for his foreign policy expertise.  By bringing Hillary on board they can now keep Hiden’ Biden for the next four years.
    • Timothy Geithner – Secretary of the Treasury – this might be one of his better picks.  Upon news of this getting out the market jumped up nearly 500 points. That wasn’t enough to save it from another down week, but maybe it will help find a bottom.
  2. Dow Jones Industrial Average Down 445 points.  The Dow which is considered a leading indicator dropped another 5% this week.  It went below 8000 until the announcement of Geithner as Treasury pick.  So in the three weeks since the election the Dow has dropped almost 1,600 points.
  3. School for the Obama Children – The Obama’s have decided where to send their children to school.  Naturally they would choose public school, right?  Since they are always telling us it is bad to have school choice.  It hurts the public school system by taking money away and we need to do more for public schools right?  Wasn’t that the whole reason behind the Department of Education?  Nope.  It will be private school for the Obama children at $28,400 per year.  The Department of Education was created during the Carter Administration.  But Amy Carter, the daughter of President Jimmy Carter, also attended public schools, the first child of a president to do so since Theordore Roosevelt’s son Quentin in 1904.  Parents in the District of Columbia have been begging for school vouchers to be able to send their children to any school public or private, but the Democrats are adamantly opposed them (can you say teacher’s union?).  Apparently, the Democrats believe the public schools are just fine, as long as their children don’t go anywhere near them.

Stay tuned…

Share and Recommend:
© 2010 Liberty's Lifeline. All Rights Reserved.